Conspiracy theorists question differences between Blue Origin and SpaceX rockets after space return

Spread the love

Conspiracy theorists raise questions after noticing differences between Blue Origin and SpaceX rocket landings during recent space missions.

Recently, conspiracy theorists have raised interesting questions about Blue Origin’s rocket.

After comparing it to SpaceX’s Falcon rocket, they noted some differences in how the capsules looked after returning to Earth.

This has sparked discussions online, especially among those who enjoy speculating about such topics.

Conspiracy theorists question differences between Blue Origin and SpaceX rockets after space return

conspiracy theorists question differences between blue origin and spacex ro 22314
Blue Origin capsule compared to SpaceX rocket sparks online conspiracy buzz. Image Credit: Blue Origin

Initially, some theorists claimed that Katy Perry’s space flight was fake, suggesting it was created using special effects.

They questioned why anyone would fake sending six women into space for just a short time.

Such claims often lack logical reasoning, but conspiracy theories can be persistent and intriguing to some.

The capsule’s condition raised significant doubts.

Another point of interest is the condition of the Blue Origin capsule after its flight. Conspiracy theorists observed that the capsule did not show significant signs of damage.

Unlike many other spacecraft returning from orbit, which often appear burned and battered, the Blue Origin capsule looked almost new.

This led to suspicions about the legitimacy of the mission.

conspiracy theorists question differences between blue origin and spacex ro 22316
Blue Origin capsule shows little damage, raising authenticity questions. Image Credit: Blue Origin

To understand these concerns, it is essential to know how re-entry works.

See also  Elon Musk believes SpaceX can establish self-sustaining life on Mars in 20 to 30 years

When a spacecraft re-enters Earth’s atmosphere, it experiences intense heat. This heat is caused by air compressing in front of the falling object.

When a spacecraft travels fast enough, this compressed air heats up and can cause burns.

The speed of re-entry greatly affects burns.

The speed of a spacecraft plays a crucial role in how much heat it experiences during re-entry.

Spacecraft in orbit travel at thousands of miles per hour to maintain their position within Earth’s gravitational pull.

This high speed leads to more significant heat and damage upon returning to Earth.

conspiracy theorists question differences between blue origin and spacex ro 22317
SpaceX’s condition after landing. Image Credit: Getty

Blue Origin’s flight path avoids extreme speeds.

Blue Origin’s spacecraft, however, does not achieve orbit. It travels to the edge of space and then releases its capsule.

Because the capsule does not reach the high speeds of orbiting spacecraft, it descends at a gentler speed.

This lower speed means it does not suffer the same level of heat damage during re-entry.

The capsule descends gently, minimizing heat damage.

The Blue Origin capsule parachutes down to Earth, which helps it avoid severe burns.

The design and trajectory of its flight result in a smoother return.

Therefore, the capsule appears less damaged compared to other spacecraft that endure harsher re-entry conditions.

conspiracy theorists question differences between blue origin and spacex ro 22313
SpaceX’s condition after returning from space. Image Credit: Getty

Heat shields provide essential protection during re-entry.

Many spacecraft are equipped with heat shields to protect against re-entry burns.

These shields are designed to absorb heat and prevent damage to the craft.

They can be made of materials that evaporate or dissipate heat, providing an extra layer of safety.

The design of a spacecraft can significantly affect how it handles re-entry.

See also  Conspiracy theorists claim Blue Origin space flight with Katy Perry and Lauren Sánchez was faked

Capsules from previous missions often have blunt shapes to help dissipate hot air.

This design choice aids in managing the extreme temperatures experienced during re-entry, allowing the spacecraft to survive the journey back to Earth.

conspiracy theorists question differences between blue origin and spacex ro 22315
Users online claim mission was staged to attract wealthy customers. Image Credit: Blue Origin

Social media reactions

One user said: The nearest thing to space they came to is the empty one between their ears

The second user added: It was staged.

The third user wrote: They got paid to say they did that in order to get tons of rich people to line up and go next. In reality they did what they do daily and were actors.

The fourth user commented: I don’t care about all the inconsistencies. I just don’t want them to be called astronauts

Another user said: They never went to space, who make them believe they did?? Imagine paying $25mio to get shot in the air and tell people they went to space.

Someone said: One thing I see different is Space X went through a plethora of tests and data to get the rockets to perform safely for transport.

This little, homemade-looking rocket carrying 6 souls went through 0 tests. So they assumed it’d be safe??


Spread the love